HALLOWELL — An ambitious proposed path connecting the Kennebec River Rail Trail and the Androscoggin Riverwalk has a base of support laid, but it’s far from paved.
The roughly 30-mile recreational Merrymeeting Trail would link the Kennebec trail, which runs from Augusta to Gardiner, and the Androscoggin walk, which connects Topsham and Brunswick. The latest boost for the missing link came Monday with a unanimous vote of support from the Hallowell City Council. The city joins Richmond, Gardiner and Bowdoinham as municipalities that officially have thrown their support behind the plan.
But a big hurdle remains how public and private funding might be tapped to cover the millions of dollars it would cost, even as funding is cut for other transportation projects.
“It’s dangerous in the downtown section on a bike or with a stroller,” Hallowell Councilor Diano Circo said at Monday’s meeting, referring to the busy downtown sidewalks and needing to cross the street to get back on the trail at some point.
Councilor Maureen Aucoin, who lives along the dormant railroad tracks in Hallowell, said she would favor using them for the trail, because residents commonly walk along them. She also said trail landscaping would clean up the debris on the tracks.
The connector trail, which has been proposed for about a decade, is also the subject of a resolution in front of the Legislature.
Rep. Charlotte Warren, D-Hallowell, is the sponsor of L.D. 1141, titled “Resolve, Directing the Department of Transportation To Construct the Merrymeeting Trail from Topsham to Gardiner.” She said the bill isn’t directly ordering the transportation department to build the trail, but instead directing them to look at it during their planning process.
“It’s to point the (transportation department) in the right direction and it’s to get moving on what the (department) has declared a trail of statewide significance,” she said.
Hallowell resident Frank O’Hara, who addressed the council Monday, said it was estimated in 2010 that the trail would cost $8 million if it was created over the existing railroad tracks; the estimate then to build it alongside the tracks was $52 million.
Warren said the trail, if put over the tracks, could be reclaimed by the transportation department if commuter rail service was to be restored.
“It’s an opportunity to use it for its best use right now,” she said.
Warren said in an interview that she favored a “public-private partnership” for funding, meaning some money from taxpayers would be used and other funding would be made up of donations or other like sources.
“We are going to be going to a lot of companies that are local to the trail that have stated, in their mission, support outside activities,” she said. “We think it’s a real opportunity for local hospitals or other companies … if they want to help us.”
And there is support for the project outside of the walls of council and Legislative chambers.
On Wednesday, Chelsea Cutler-Worcester, of Vassalboro, was in downtown Hallowell at the foot of the Kennebec River Rail Trail with Kim Cutler, of Connecticut, and Anne Marie Riley, of Washington state. All three said they support expanding the trail because it could help visitors explore more Maine towns.
“I think it’s nice to have more options for places to walk,” Cutler-Worcester said, adding that she uses the trail a couple of times a year as a safe place to walk with her daughter.
“Anything that can promote walkability is great,” Riley said.
Testimony was heard by the Legislature’s Committee on Transportation earlier this month. A number of private citizens provided testimony in favor of the bill, saying it could help stimulate economies in the towns it passes through and promote a healthy lifestyle for residents.
But while there is vocal support for the project, there also are detractors, notably the Maine Department of Transportation.
First, the department is facing significant challenges in paying for planned projects because of quickly escalating costs. This month, it slashed more than $59 million in road and bridge projects from its annual work plan as a result of budget constraints and rising construction costs. Nationwide, construction costs hit a 10-year high last year and highway construction costs rose almost 13 percent in 2018, according to the Federal Highway Administration.
Meghan Russo, the transportation department’s manager of legislative and constituent services, testified in opposition to the bill on May 7. She noted that the project would be more expensive than estimated in 2010.
“Nine years have passed … in which degradation of the facilities has occurred and construction costs have increased,” she wrote. “It is extremely likely that both of the options … would be considerably costlier today.”
Russo said L.D. 1141 would also fly in the face of the state’s Rail Preservation Act, which states that the transportation department “may not dismantle” state-owned track unless it is determined “that removal of a specific length of rail owned by the State will not have a negative impact on a region or on future economic opportunities for that region.”
Russo said about $9.2 million of federal, state, and local funding is going toward trail systems across the state in the transportation department’s current three-year work plan. Transportation department spokesman Paul Merrill said no trail projects were cut this year as a result of the “serious funding issues.”
Warren said she was not surprised by the Department of Transportation’s opposition, because it resists short-term, mandated projects and favors longer-term work plans.
“We don’t want people going in and directing DOT to do projects,” she said. “They come out and oppose every piece of legislation (directing them to do something because) it’s just not the process.”
Richard Rudolph, chairman of the Rail Users’ Network, an independent national organization that represents rail passengers, also opposed the bill. He said the return of a railroad would be a larger economic boon than a bicycle path.
Rudolph said service between Brunswick and Bangor could provide options for commuters and vacationers, and force economic development around train stations. He cited Portland’s Thompson’s Point — home to a concert venue, restaurants and bars — as an example of infrastructure that has popped up around transportation hubs.
“You could see this as a commuter service … that people might hop on for work.” Rudolph said. “It makes no financial sense (to build a bicycle path) at this time.”
O’Hara disagreed with Rudolph’s assessment, saying implementing rail service would end up costing people more than it gave them in economic benefit. The Associated Press reported in March that a Lewiston-to-Portland passenger rail service could cost $300 million. O’Hara said passenger service would be the first priority if the transportation department wanted to restore it, but questioned consumer demand for the service.
“The average ridership from Brunswick to Portland (on the Amtrak Downeaster) is 8 people per trip,” he said. “If passenger rail was to come (where the Merrymeeting Trail is proposed,) it would take an hour and 45 minutes at least to go from Augusta to Portland.”
He also said Maine could tap into “bicycle tourism” with the trail, which could see people from Boston taking the train to Brunswick to get on the trail and travel to Augusta.
When asked about the economic comparison between rail travel through towns and recreational trails through towns, Warren mentioned the Trek Across Maine — a popular biking event that leads participants through a number of Maine municipalities — as an example of an economic stimulant that will pass through Hallowell because it has a recreational trail.
The bill is co-sponsored by Reps. Seth Berry, D-Bowdoinham, Thom Harnett, D-Gardiner, Allison Hepler, D-Woolwich, and Denise Tepler, D-Topsham; and Sen. Eloise Vitelli, D-Sagadahoc.
Send questions/comments to the editors.