A $220 million steamroller is coming to Maine, and everyone who uses Central Maine Power or Versant Power for electricity is directly in its path. But the state Legislature can save us by reforming, or even ending, the net energy billing program for large-scale solar developers. The passage of L.D. 1347 would be a strong move in the right direction.
L.D. 1347 would authorize the Maine Public Utilities Commission to periodically adjust the state subsidy for the development of solar electricity-generating facilities so that it is fair to both solar developers and customers. Rich Abrahamson/Morning Sentinel, File
The net energy billing program was instituted by Maine law and dictates the price paid for community solar, a price that is much higher than the actual value of the power.
AARP Maine continues to fight to keep utility rates fair and reasonable in the state with the country’s oldest population. Maine already has electricity rates that are higher than the national average, and they have increased even further in the last 12 months. Rising utility costs, coupled with higher housing, food and medicine expenses, force many vulnerable older adults to make tough choices. However, electricity costs are a particular concern and have increased faster than the rate of inflation.
One solution to these out-of-control costs can be homegrown sustainable energy. But the cost to customers must match the benefits, and the net energy billing program is currently anything but fair. The original intent of net energy billing was to offer incentives to homeowners installing rooftop solar panels and sending unused energy back to the grid. In 2019, the law was expanded to include larger-scale projects, which had unintended consequences for customers. The current community solar payment scheme could add $23 a month ($275 a year) to Maine’s already too-high electricity bills to subsidize large-scale solar developers. The first of these new costs is coming this summer and will raise Mainers’ electricity rates by at least $9 to $10 per month.
Many of us look to the Maine Public Utilities Commission to regulate these rate increases, but the PUC regulates only part of our electricity bill: the supply services. As a result, when the Legislature considers who will pay for new policy mandates, the only option is to impose those costs on a utility’s delivery rates. In Maine, these delivery rates are billed by CMP, Versant and some smaller local utilities. The rate increases are then added to the regulated costs, to pay for things like customer service, investments to improve service reliability, metering, billing and storm restoration costs. The bottom line is that it is the Maine consumer who ultimately absorbs the rate increases. It is important to note that for many older Mainers, even a seemingly small monthly increase can be problematic.
Working together, we can take a broader look at this problem and find a better solution. While this summer’s painful increase in electricity prices is a done deal, future bleeding can be stopped if our Legislature acts right now. Without reforms, the net energy billing program alone will cost customers $220 million a year for the next 20 years, according to the Maine Office of the Public Advocate. This is far more than it’s worth and represents a raw deal for Maine customers.
We support the Office of the Public Advocate’s proposal to reform the net energy billing program, which has been put forth in L.D. 1347. This bill would authorize the PUC to periodically adjust the subsidy so that it is fair to both solar developers and customers. It preserves the program for small rooftop projects where most of the energy is consumed by the owner, and it promotes the state’s goals of shifting to renewable energy and keeping electricity rates fair and reasonable.
AARP Maine is urging its members and every Mainer to call on their legislators to reform the net energy billing program before the end of the current legislative session and pass the reforms included in L.D. 1347.
Customers in Maine can’t afford to wait.
Send questions/comments to the editors.
