HOWELL, Mich. — Calling opponents of his plans “complicit in America’s decline,” President Biden made the case Tuesday that his ambitious social spending proposal is key to America’s global competitiveness – even as he acknowledged the current $3.5 trillion price tag will shrink.
With his plans in jeopardy on Capitol Hill, Biden journeyed to Michigan, declaring he wanted to “set some things straight” about his agenda and cut through what he dismissed as “noise” in Washington.
“America’s still the largest economy in the world, we still have the most productive workers and the most innovative minds in the world, but we’re at risk of losing our edge as a nation,” he said at a union training center, surrounded by bulldozers and other heavy equipment.
The president went on to spell out his plans in greater detail than he has in some time, after spending the past week deep in the details of negotiations on Capitol Hill. He highlighted popular individual parts of the plan, including funding for early childhood education and investments to combat climate change, rather than the expensive topline. And he emphasized that the trillions in spending would be drawn out over a decade and paid for by tax increases on corporations and the wealthiest Americans.
Speaking briefly to reporters afterward, Biden acknowledged that the overall $3.5 trillion number for his social spending bill will decline, but he insisted that he and Democrats in Congress will “get it done.”
On Capitol Hill, strong signs were emerging that Democrats were coalescing around Biden’s push for a slimmed-down package in the $2 trillion range, a figure that seemed potentially acceptable to West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin and other centrists with reservations. With all Republicans opposed, Biden can’t spare a single Democratic senator.
Polling suggests that elements in the social spending bill and a related $1 trillion infrastructure bill – such as expanded child care opportunities and roads-and-bridges infrastructure projects – are popular with large parts of the public. But even some of the White House’s closest allies have worried that the West Wing has not done enough to sell the spending. That brought Biden back on the road Tuesday, hitting the red-leaning district of Democratic Rep. Elissa Slotkin to sell his policies.
“These bills are not about left versus right or moderate vs progressive,” Biden said. “These bills are about competitiveness versus complacency.”
Back in Washington, negotiations continued on the pair of bills to boost spending on safety net, health and environmental programs and infrastructure projects. The $3.5 trillion price tag on the social services portion of Biden’s agenda has long been the sticking point, with progressives demanding the funding for their priorities and moderates balking at the eye-popping number. But there’s a growing consensus – which Biden has expressed privately to lawmakers, and acknowledged publicly Tuesday – that the topline number will eventually shrink.
In multiple private meetings, Biden has now floated $2 trillion as a figure for his signature package, including in a call late Monday with progressive House lawmakers, who still advocated for a higher amount, according to a person granted anonymity to discuss the private meeting.
While there is cautious optimism about recent progress, no deal has been struck to bridge stark divides between moderates and progressives in Biden’s Democratic Party on the size and scope of the social spending package. In recent weeks, as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has worked unsuccessfully to secure passage of the bills, Biden has stayed in Washington to cajole lawmakers.
Now, he’s trying to put the public focus on popular components of the bills rather than the inside-the-Beltway debate over the price tag.
Next to Biden, the Democrats with the most on the line over the shape and success of his spending plans are House members from swing districts whose reelections are essential if his party is to retain control of Congress.
Many of those targeted moderates – including Arizona Rep. Tom O’Halleran, Virginia Rep. Abigail Spanberger and nine other vulnerable Democrats – joined Biden for a virtual meeting Tuesday. He held a similar session the previous day with a dozen progressives.
And his Tuesday visit to Slotkin’s district, which former President Trump narrowly won, was aimed at giving moderates like her cover to support his spending package.
While Slotkin backs the smaller, bipartisan $1 trillion infrastructure bill that has passed the Senate, she prefers passing it in the House before negotiating the broader package of social programs.
“To be honest, it was hard for me to understand why leadership decided in the first place to tie the two bills together,” Slotkin recently told The Detroit News. “That’s not how we normally operate. It’s not my preference.”
Washington was gripped with the drama last week as lawmakers grappled with the massive Democrats-only social spending bill that has been linked with the infrastructure bill. Progressives have balked at voting for the infrastructure bill if the other bill shrinks.
Yet even as talk of that shrinkage increased, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., a leader of the progressives, said Tuesday, “There’s a lot of discussion going on, but I’m confident at the end of the day it’s going to be a good agreement.”
At the same time, new battle lines are being formed as Democrats decide which of the many programs that they want to expand – health, education, childcare, climate change — will remain in the final proposal or be reduced or left behind.
“This cannot ultimately be a bill that does 18 new things, but it could do four or five or six big bold new things,” said Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, an ally of the president.
Lawmakers are considering cutting back some programs or limiting others to only people who qualify based on need.
Biden’s team huddled with the Democratic leaders late Monday at the Capitol as they rush to finish the latest draft – in “days, not weeks,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said.
One senator was moved to compare it all to dancing.
“The best image I know is a square dance: You come together, but then you go apart; you come together, but then you go apart,” said Sen. John Hickenlooper of Colorado, describing his fellow Democrats. “There’s a rhythm there, we just got to make sure we stay in rhythm. That’s the challenge.”
Associated Press writers Lisa Mascaro in Washington, Mike Householder in Howell, Michigan, and David Eggert in Lansing, Michigan, contributed to this report.
Send questions/comments to the editors.
